Wednesday, 26 August 2015

Risks or Remedies? Safety Aspects of Herbal Remedies in the UK.


Shaw, D. (1998) Risks or remedies? safety aspects of herbal remedies in the UK.  Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 91, 294-296. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1296770/pdf/jrsocmed00024-0008.pdf

This is a study about the safety of herbal medicine written by Dr. Debbie Shaw.  According to the Uppsala Monitoring Centre website (2008), the author is a Senior Research Scientist at the National Health Service Foundation Trust in London. This study was published by the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine in 1998.  The study discusses how the safety of herbal medicine is not only bound to quality, but also to usage by consumers, which are categorized as follows: first, use of incorrect herbs; second, delay in getting medical advice for patients who might develop a serious condition; third, the belief by some consumers that natural supplements are healthy; fourth, adulteration of the herbal medicine preparation.  The study is relevant, because the implications of herbal medicine, particularly its safety, is a global issue. The article refers to statistics from the World the Health Organization (WHO) and other major related institutions.  The intended audience would be medical students, the public, clinicians and regulators. The study concludes that there is a lack of communication and information with regards to herbal safety at the global level. The author suggests launching an independent information source combining safety and efficacy data which could be achieved through an adverse reaction monitoring system to be funded by medical and herbal practitioners.  Regardless of having been written almost two decades ago, the main ideas are still relevant and the article includes sufficient sources for further information. 

Efficacy, Safety, Quality Control, Marketing and Regulatory Guidelines for Herbal Medicines

Calixto, J. B. (2000). Efficacy, safety, quality control, marketing and regulatory guidelines for herbal medicines (Phytotherapeutic agents). Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 33(2),179-189. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2000000200004


This is a review about the safety, efficacy, quality control, marketing and regulation of botanical medicine, published in 2000 by the Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. The target audience would be regulatory, medical researchers, clinicians, and the public. The review is written by Professor Joao Batista Calixto a pharmacologist working at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.  The article mentions the growing market in phyto-medicine which has attracted the interest of major pharmaceutical companies.  The study highlights the lack of access to related data on most plants and states that it is a fallacy to assume that herbal medicines are totally safe. This research is relevant because despite the scientific basis by significant publications of clinical studies for general practitioner’s prescriptions, still there is a lack of data to assess the efficacy and safety of most herbal medicine.  The review indicates that in many countries including the United States herbal medicine is sold as a dietary supplement, while in some other countries like the UK, there are drug regulations on some herbals, which require the safety and efficacy need to be proved in order to be registered. The study includes a compact review of policies in different countries following the suggestion for a global regulatory mechanism for herbal medicine regulation. In order to achieve this, a variety of steps are needed including well-controlled and randomized clinical trials to prove the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine; a process of regulation achieve global harmonization, and the requirement domesticate and genetic studies need.  This research has been done more than one and half decades ago, nevertheless, the issue of herbal medicine remains crucial, therefore, more up-to-date research is needed.

Saturday, 15 August 2015

Cultural Variation in Style of Thinking

Extra compact note taking:
Culture effects
  1. Different cultures = different ways in which people approach a task
  2. Each Culture Þ bring diff purposes Þ way of thinking Þconsequently finishes with different results  
  3. Traditions have specific implications Þ not just WHAT to think Þ but also HOW to think.
Different systems of educations in different countries:
Conserving systems of education
Extending systems of education
Questioning is not welcomed
Asking questions is encouraged
Information is exclusively limited to what teachers dictate
Students get supports to search for information by themselves
Students are obliged to imitate exactly what they are taught
Students are encouraged for further exploration
Memorization
Critical thinking
keep a preserving behaviour
Attitude to extend knowledge
Learning approach results in repeating the existing knowledge
Learning approach oriented toward  speculation

Different approach Þ emphasize on particular disciplines Þ distinctive styles of writing.
Robert Kaplan: Five distinct patterns for structuring expository writings.
In Western cultures:
English = linear Þ stick to the idea Þ strict on relevance Þ moving right to the point.  Romance & Russian = similar linear Þ moving a bit around the main idea permitted. Semitic = parallelism Þ repeats variations of the same sentences, either reflect or contradict the main idea. Oriental = circles around the topic, defining ideas in the opposite way.   
Each academic discipline Þ happens in a specific discourse Þ create a subculture
Subcultures Þ presenting their contents in their own applicable approaches.
Sub cultures Þ different criteria for determining relevance.
Common rules: Brevity + clarity + reliability
Same materials used in different ways in different disciplines. i.e. statistics, formula, graphics and illustrations. 
Different disciplines lead to think differently and advise (flexibility)
 Cultural background interferes studying abroad. 
Asian students need to develop analytical and critical ways in order to study successfully.